Australian EnterpriseAI Index
Q2 2026Final Edition

State of Enterprise AI
in Australia — Q2 2026

Published 10 June 2026·~28 pages
On this page
01

Executive Summary

National Score

43.4

out of 100

Australia's enterprise AI maturity stands at a national composite score of 43.4/100 in Q2 2026, placing the country in the Developing band. Investment leads at 45.7, while Incidents remains the lowest-scoring dimension at 41.6.

The gap between Investment (45.7) and Governance (42.8) is the most consequential structural risk in the current landscape — organisations are deploying faster than they are governing, a pattern that historically precedes a regulatory inflection point.

National maturity stands at 43.4 — Investment and Adoption lead

Australia's composite AI maturity score is 43.4 in Q2 2026. Investment (45.7) and Adoption (43.4) are the leading dimensions, though the national index remains in the Developing band overall.

Governance remains a structural gap

Governance sits at 42.8, 2.9 points below Investment — a structural gap that creates regulatory risk as deployment accelerates.

Retail governance is a rising risk

Retail's Governance score of 27.1 is the lowest across all six industries and 15.7 points below the national average. As AI deployment in retail accelerates (56.3 Adoption), the governance gap is widening.

02

National Index

Q2 2026 — Dimension Scores

Adoption
66.2
Governance
58.5
Investment
67.5
Incidents
49.4
DimensionHighestLowest
Adoption57.148.0
Governance51.346.8
Investment59.746.7
Incidents48.436.2

Highest/lowest scoring industry per dimension, Q2 2026

03

Industry Rankings

Industry Rankings

Live

Latest · Composite score out of 100

All industries
🏦 Banking

Banking retains its #1 position with a 56.8 composite score, driven by production AI deployments in fraud detection and credit risk. ASIC's AI Governance Review identifies missing human oversight as the sector's #1 regulatory risk.

🛡️ Insurance

Insurance ranks #3 at 47.3, with IAG's claims triage deployment the standout signal. APRA's supervisory communication on model risk management is a governance reminder for a sector moving faster on investment than accountability.

🛒 Retail

Retail's #2 position (43.8) masks a serious governance deficit — at 27.1, the lowest in the index. Governance capacity is not keeping pace as adoption accelerates.

🏛️ Government

Government ranks #5 at 34.2 — its governance strength (47.9, highest in the index) is held back by the lowest investment score (24.1).

🏥 Healthcare

Healthcare at 45.6 (#4) is the most cautiously progressing sector, with system-wide adoption lagging other industries.

⚡ Utilities

Utilities at 32.5 (#6) is the lowest-scoring sector, with adoption still in a nascent stage relative to the rest of the index.

04

Top AI Investments — Q2 2026

No independently verifiable, sourced AI investment announcements met our publication threshold this quarter. Check back after the next data refresh.

05

AI Incidents & Governance Watch

Incidents are inverse-scored — transparency in disclosure partially credits the organisation. Only incidents with a verifiable public source are listed here.

No independently verifiable AI incidents or governance actions met our publication threshold this quarter. Check back after the next data refresh.

06

Outlook — Q3 2026

OAIC is expected to publish updated AI privacy guidance in Q3 2026, which may materially lift Governance scores across Banking and Healthcare.

The federal government's AI in Government Framework review is due by August 2026 — watch for new mandatory disclosure requirements that could restructure how Government sector is scored.

Retail AI investment is accelerating faster than governance capacity — the Governance gap (27.1 vs 56.3 Adoption) is likely to widen further unless sector-level self-regulatory action is taken before Q3 2026.

Get Q3 2026 when it drops

Subscribe free to receive the next AEAI report the moment it publishes in September 2026. No spam — one email per quarter.

Subscribe — it's free